Sunday, May 31, 2009

Why is Rush Limbaugh so much smarter than Obama?

If one were to compare the economic predictions made by Limbaugh and Obama, he would come with rather peculiar conclusions. Rush Imbaugh appears to be a much smarter and knowledgable man. Here are a few examples.

Obama said the following Dover, N.H., on Sept. 12.
"And I can make a firm pledge: under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase - not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."

Obama's side-kick, Joe "Dumbass" Biden reiterated Obama's claims: ""No one making less than $250,000 under Barack Obama's plan will see one single penny of their tax raised, whether it's their capital gains tax, their income tax, investment tax, any tax."

On the other side, if you listened to Rush's radio show, you would know that Rush minced no words on Obama's tax plans. There was surely no way Obama could pay for his European-style government programs by increasing taxes solely on the top 5%.

And what do you know - now president Baba is coming back with plethora of new taxes for the middle class - tax on your CO2 emission, tax on your medical insurance, tax on your purchases.

All in all, Rush Limbaugh was 100% in his predictions. Does it mean he is smarter than president Baba? I report, you decide.

Can a latina woman understand the US Constitution?

Recently it came to the attention of the US public, that Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court, Red Sonia, said that she was a better judge than any white male because she was a "latina woman". It was something about her experience, upbringing, culture and last but not least her physiology. Lets pretend that Red Sonia is correct, and indeed all that has a profound effect on her decisions as a judge. Should we not then question whether she is inherently qualified to correctly understand the laws and regulations written by the rich white males? I mean, she does not have the experience, upbringing, culture and the physiology of the rich white males - how in the hell do you expect her to understand the US Constitution?!

That's quite a conundrum, isn't it? Once you abandon the idea of a blind justice, justice which is metered independently of the skin color, experience, upbringing and physiology, the justice which strives to be just - you get very peculiar results. Can a typical liberal understand this? Very unlikely.

I always liked Calvin Coolidge

This is a very nice quote from him: "If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers."
The entire speech could be found HERE.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Will Obama bail out California?

The answer to this question is obvious - yes, Obama will very likely bail out the State of California. Why? Well, if the public accepts that federal government has a constitutional and moral right to bail out individual states, then Obama will greatly increase his power. He will be able to subsidize any state with any amount of money. This will be a major power grab, which means Obama should love it. California will be the first step, with Michigan, New York, Washington coming next - or any other liberal shit-hole. Moreover, the states run by liberals can greatly increase spending, since they will be in no danger of going bankrupt. And then, it will be the turn of liberal media outlets to stand in line for the bailouts.

Things will get very ugly very soon. Can someone pass the popcorn?

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Education is the winning issue for conservatives

Watch this video a few times until your blood boils. And then, imagine if GOP stops sucking its own dick and comes out strongly in support of more parent control over schools and teachers, of more independent schools and against the biggest liberal donor - the teacher unions.

Imagine if for a few days Fox News, talk radio and Wall Street Journal were to run this video, interviews with parents and kids. Imagine if we could give more news from DC, where Obama personally ordered to close the escapes from government schools. Lets ignite a storm! The liberals are destroying the education of our kids for financial and political benefit. All people of good will must come against this!

The EU Economy...

We've been told that only if American people saw the light and followed the progressive ways - with strong unions, government run medical care, large entitlement programs, US would become much stronger. And yet, we constantly learn that Europe's economy is in shambles. Read this article for example.

And it gets better - ahm, worse. From 1981 to 2008, EU-16 GDP grew by 1.9 times - i.e by 90%. The economy of France grew by 80%, Belgium - 80%, Austria - 90%. During same time, US economy grew by 130% - nearly double what Europe achieved. It's fair to ask - why does comrade Obama say that emulating Europe would result in faster economic growth? What is the factual basis for this claim?

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Liberal Defense of Nancy Pelosi - "She is a submissive bitch"

Liberal sites promote an interesting defense of Pelosi's acquiescence (if not even a tacit approval) of enhanced interrogation techniques used by the Bush administration. Liberals are saying that she had to be silent, since she was under the gag orders from the Bush administration. In other words, even when she was faced with most horrific illegal, morale busting, criminal bebahior from the Bush administration - she chose to be silent because she was ordered to. "Nancy Pelosi is a submissive bitch" - is an interesting defense for one of the top liberal politicians in this nation. And mind you, liberals are saying this with pride. What a bunch of patriots!

The month of the long knifes

As you may know, the speaker of the House is being slowly cut into tiny pieces by the newest revelations of her complicity in the so-called "torture" of the moslem terrorists Islamic militants. It was revealed that Nancy Pelosi, a staunch opponent of waterboarding was lying when she said that she had not been informed about the waterboarding in 2002. In fact, she knew all along that CIA was using "enhanced interrogation techniques" back then, and she did not even squawk. Of course, as Nancy's assistant correctly said - 2002 was a time when everyone was afraid of a terrorist attack man-made disaster, and both the public and the government of all levels and from all parties were very supportive of practically any measures that would keep America safe.

So, what the hell is happening now, and who is benefiting from this? I must say, that contrary to the mainstream view, the biggest winner in Obama himself. Lets not forget that right now, US is ruled essentially by one party. And it is an easy guess that Obama will try to keep it this way by silencing all independent media, taking control of the liberal media (watch the bailout of the NYT as a start), massive pay-to-play schemes and, the final step - putting ACORN in charge of voter registration as well as the counting of ballots. This program is quite on the march now. So, what Obama is trying to do is to solidify his control over the Democratic party. And what is a better way than to weaken the top Democrat in the House of Representatives? Today, Nancy's political career is in the hands of Barack Hussein Obama. By a move of his pinky he can make her lose her power. Essentially, she can continue being the Speaker only if Obama allows it. Her political life is dependent on his benevolence. One wrong move on her part - and she is gone. This is the power that any dictator needs, and Obama surely knows this.

So, boys and girls, don't celebrate the infamy of the madam Speaker - it may be only a small part of the big plan. Now, Obama controls the House, it belongs to him. This is why I strongly doubt Nancy is losing her position any time soon - she is Obama's bitch now. And Obama takes care of his bitches.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

How to slash medical costs in 5 easy steps

1. Allow the sale in the US of all medical drugs which are legal in EU, Canada, Australia and Japan. FDA approval should be optional.

2. Everyone who has a doctor's license in those countries should be allowed to practice medicine in US. Moreover, US policy must encourage and aid immigration of doctors from those countries to America. Immediate permanent residency to all practicing doctors from developed countries who want to come to the US.

3. Abolish state limitations on minimum medical insurance coverage.

4. Give private doctors and hospitals same protection from lawsuits as the government entities have.

5. Stop the influx of illegal immigrants.

Is torture okay? Depends on who does it...

Liberals are long known for their love for Ernesto Che Gevara. Even a liberal website concedes that the guy took personal pleasure in torturing and executing his political enemies.

In 1959, Che Guevara was appointed commander of the La Cabana Fortress prison. During his term as commander of the fortress from 1959-1963, he oversaw the execution of what some estimate to be approximately 500 political prisoners and regime opponents. Many individuals imprisoned at La Cabana, such as poet and human rights activist Armando Valladares, allege that Guevara took particular and personal interest in the interrogation, torture, and execution of some prisoners.

And yet, they fake outrage when a moslem terrorist who holds valuable information is waterboarded with explicit purpose to save American lives.

WTF is wrong with liberals? Can they be more stupid?

It is a common misconception....

It is a common misconception by the right-wingers that Obama is a weak leader, who does not understand the world and who wears rosy glasses when looking at American enemies. I personally think that it's very unlikely that a Chicago thug could be so naive. Do you think that Obama could have risen through the ranks of the most corrupt political machine in the nation if he were a naive child? No way, completely impossible!

Which brings me to the second point. If Obama is not naive, and he knows that his policies undermine American security, then it is very likely that he is doing this ON PURPOSE! He wants US to be attacked, because he knows a big war is the only thing that could save his presidency and win him a second term. It all makes sense, if you think about.