Our republican leaders have lost the connection with the middle class Americans. They don’t understand anymore what issues concern us most – and I am not sure they even care. At this point I don’t care for them either, we need new young leaders who are not afraid to upset the status quo and fight for this country. In order to win, GOP must appeal to the middle class, it must become a popular party, and it must fight back. And sure enough, we should learn from the other side. Firstly, GOP must start following the Alinsky’s rules for radicals. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."
We can destroy the DNC if we follow this simple rule. And the current debacle with H1N1 vaccines is a golden opportunity to strike back at the liberal establishment.
Obama wants to spread the wealth? Obama wants everyone to have same healthcare? All children should have same coverage? All right, comrade. Then same rules applies to you and your children. No more jumping in front of the line to get the vaccine. My children should be treated no better than the children of a welfare bum? My kids should stand in the same line for 3 hours with the kids of illegal immigrants? Fair enough - then send YOUR Natasha and Malia, and have them stand together with my kids in the same line. If you want social justice - then live it, don't push it on others. If you want the government perks and privileges, then you cannot demand the middle class to share its wealth. Either all of us have to provide their fair share and sacrifice – or none at all. An American president behaving like a middle-eastern nabob, while appealing to social justice?! As Alinsky said: “Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."
At this point, the GOP must start exploiting the popular anger. Remember, there are literally millions of very upset people, who are standing for hours on the streets, waiting to get the government vaccines. These people pay taxes, play by the rules, and now they are screwed by the teleprompter in chief. He plays golf, goes to cocktail parties, calls for sharing the wealth, tells the masses that everyone is equal – and the middle is stuck with higher taxes and no vaccines. Is this the social justice he promised? Is this the equality he was supposed to deliver? Is this the new and changed America he promoted?
How about an ad with a series of pictures - long lines for the vaccines for the middle class, an interview with an outraged parent – NYT report on Obama's children getting their vaccines without any trouble and inconvenience - Obama talking about how all kids are precious and how all have to be treated the same. This followed by the CNN glamorous report about Obama’s exquisite cocktail parties, another quick interview with an upset parent, Obama talking about spreading the wealth, Obama talking about new America – and another picture of long-long lines for vaccines. Obama: We are the ones we were waiting for” – a mother with a child on her shoulders, who just did not get a vaccine, and she is upset and she is crying. Ask the mother who voted for Obama – did she vote for this?
A few more quick picks: If I vote for Obama, I don’t have to pay my mortgage
When Obama in power: People trying to get free money
Another scene – a mother is upset – “We pay for these vaccines in taxes, but we cannot get them”. Is this the Obama America?” And then we get an interview with a man who just lost his job, a family which is losing its house. And then a piece of Obama telling the people that economy is getting better. And lastly – another CNN report on Obama’s vacation, a few pictures from the People magazine, and Michele’s claims how much she had to sacrifice to come to Copenhagen.
This ad is fairly easy to do - just go to the next place which is distributing the H1N1 vaccine and talk to the people in line. Talk to the people when the doctors tell the crowd to go home because there are no vaccines. It's so simple, really...
In the conclusion of this rant, I want to tell you that the task at hand is fairly simple and straightforward, and I say this from personal experience. I was born and raised in the USSR, and I distinctly remember the fall of the Soviet Empire. What broke the spine of the regime was not the just publication of the communist crimes – these was fairly well known. The Soviet elite was ousted when the plebs started openly questioning the government perks and openly mocking their left-wing propaganda. It was a devastating weapon - when the left claims everyone is equal, and yet demands special treatment for themselves – people get mightily annoyed, and the bureaucrats get really uncomfortable when people start asking questions.
We can destroy the Obama regime – but we must attack them with scorn and mockery, not just intellectual talking points. I am all in favor of quoting Hayek and Friedman, but awaking people’s outrage at the corruption and hypocrisy of the Obamunists is a much more immediate and devastating weapon.
If you are suddenly in the mood to read the insane ramblings of a Jewish-Russian-Chinese Cossack about American politics (word of caution: English is his second language) - then you found the right blog. If you like what I am writing - please respond, leave a comment and share this blog with your friends. If you don't like what I am writing - please respond, leave a comment and share this blog with your friends.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Saturday, October 31, 2009
A challenge to liberals...
Dear liberals,
Do you believe it's "socially just" that Obama's kids got government distributed H1Na vaccines from their personal doctor, while the hardworking parents had to stand hours in long lines under rain to have their children vaccinated - and many were sent home because there were not enough vaccines?
Do you think that if Obama's kids were put in exact same conditions as the kids from less afluent families, then he would have paid more attention to the production of the vaccine and the nation would not face the severe shortages?
Do you believe it's "socially just" that Obama's kids got government distributed H1Na vaccines from their personal doctor, while the hardworking parents had to stand hours in long lines under rain to have their children vaccinated - and many were sent home because there were not enough vaccines?
Do you think that if Obama's kids were put in exact same conditions as the kids from less afluent families, then he would have paid more attention to the production of the vaccine and the nation would not face the severe shortages?
More on the H1N1 vaccines or back to the USSR
My wife just called - she stood in line for 3 hours under rain with a baby on her hands and yet our 1.5 year old son could not get a H1N1 vaccine because the doctors ran out of doses. It all resembled the good old Soviet times - unruly crowds, people cutting in the front on the line, and at the end of the day - there is not enough for everyone.
But fear not, comrades, you would be happy to know that Obama's kids got the swine flu vaccine - without any lines or delays, reported a few days ago by the venerable NYT. Moreover, in the comment section it is claimed that DC has an abundance of the vaccines - which is a tad strange, given that Obama administration produced 1 vaccine per 15 Americans. On the second thought, I am not surprised that the “people’s servant” gets the flu vaccine before his masters, “we the people” get it. After all, do you really want the people who implement government policies to feel the results of the failure of those policies? Come on! Be realistic. The government is here to help you, so it makes sense when the government agents get all the goods. Back to the USSR - long lines for the plebs, the nation's political capital gets everything faster than anyone else, and the government officials (same ones who were responsible to make sure there are enough vaccines for everyone) jump in front of the line.
Anyway, I am happy that Obama’s kids are safe now. Once all the legacy cats in the federal government get enough - it will be time for the taxpayers. So, don’t worry, be happy, things will get better when the leeches feel their stomachs.
My neighbor today said something profound - American people are being vaccinated for the Obama-care through standing in long lines under rain with their children on their hands for the H1N1 vaccine. Get used to it, comrades. It's USSR time.
But fear not, comrades, you would be happy to know that Obama's kids got the swine flu vaccine - without any lines or delays, reported a few days ago by the venerable NYT. Moreover, in the comment section it is claimed that DC has an abundance of the vaccines - which is a tad strange, given that Obama administration produced 1 vaccine per 15 Americans. On the second thought, I am not surprised that the “people’s servant” gets the flu vaccine before his masters, “we the people” get it. After all, do you really want the people who implement government policies to feel the results of the failure of those policies? Come on! Be realistic. The government is here to help you, so it makes sense when the government agents get all the goods. Back to the USSR - long lines for the plebs, the nation's political capital gets everything faster than anyone else, and the government officials (same ones who were responsible to make sure there are enough vaccines for everyone) jump in front of the line.
Anyway, I am happy that Obama’s kids are safe now. Once all the legacy cats in the federal government get enough - it will be time for the taxpayers. So, don’t worry, be happy, things will get better when the leeches feel their stomachs.
My neighbor today said something profound - American people are being vaccinated for the Obama-care through standing in long lines under rain with their children on their hands for the H1N1 vaccine. Get used to it, comrades. It's USSR time.
This is damn funny...
I was reading an article from the Washington (com)Post about Breibart, a man who single-handidly put ACORN on the radar of American people and forced mainstream media to release some of the damaging information on Obama's alma mater. The author quotes a paid operative for the Soros-funded group "Media Matters", who critisizes Breitbart by saying that "Capturing a raw video isn't journalism; journalism includes some content. A real journalist would have contacted ACORN..."
In reality, this is a weird response, since the entire report on the ACORN machinations was an accurate depiction of the ACORN response to a series of questions. Two aspiring journalists contacted numerous ACORN offices and asked them for assistance in setting up whore houses, importing underage girls for prostitution and the ways to shield their profits from taxation. ACORN was only too kind to oblige - and Breitbart showed to the world the ACORN response. What exactly is the critisism here?
In reality, this is a weird response, since the entire report on the ACORN machinations was an accurate depiction of the ACORN response to a series of questions. Two aspiring journalists contacted numerous ACORN offices and asked them for assistance in setting up whore houses, importing underage girls for prostitution and the ways to shield their profits from taxation. ACORN was only too kind to oblige - and Breitbart showed to the world the ACORN response. What exactly is the critisism here?
Thursday, October 29, 2009
The swine flu vaccine - update
Sometimes I read liberals newspapers - just for the giggles. Today, my eyes were drawn to an article by the New York Times about the flu vaccines.
The article is quite unremarkable, the author is glad to inform the readers that president Obama is dealing very effectively with the flu epidemic. It says that Obama left little to chance, namely:
1. He created a website with public information;
2. He produced a series of public announcements which as the NYT says "featured fuzzy Sesame Street characters Elmo and Rosita singing in English and Spanish";
3. Obama even "staged role-playing exercises for public health officials". There were uncomfirmed reports that Barack Obama took an active part in the role-playing and came to the exercise dressed as a fireman, while Michele Obama was a Dominatrix;
4. And lets not forget the highly memorable and efficient appeal by Obama to the people of Earth to wash their hands and wipe their asses;
5. Lastly, Obama met with a lot of people and told his team to work hard.
In short, Obama was nothing short of brilliant in his struggle against the swine flu. There was one tiny little problem - maybe the word "problem" is a bit too strong, I guess we should say a "hic-up" - and I am not sure is even worth mentioning. Namely, not enough vaccines were made. Obama's administration promised in July to deliver 120 million doses of vaccine by the end of October. In reality, 23.2 million doses were made available to the masses. That's about 1 vaccine per 15 Americans - and Obama handily beat the record previously held by the Soviet Army, when in autumn of 1941 it was providing about one rifle per four soldiers on the frontlines with the Nazi wermacht.
I don't know about you, but I would say that this situation is typical - Obama wages a brilliant campaign filled with slogans and speeches, nice websites are run by well-trained people, and the president himself makes heart-felt appeals to the masses - but at the end of the day, well, people are left standing in the rain waiting for the actual cure. And some of them blame Obama for this?! The ungrateful bitches!
At some point, Obama will blew the casket at the annoying prols who whine about the so-called issues, and he will most likely sound like John Cleese from Fawlty Towers.
Scroll to the end of the video around 28th minute to see John Cleese, who finally had it and gives all he has to the guests of his hotel.
In fact, I believe John Cleese perfectly encapsulates the reply that Obama administration is already giving to the plebs - from complaint that troublemakers with nothing better to do are sticking noses into his affairs to the conclusion that his critics are nazis. I am really curious at what point he will tell the American people to pack their things and leave HIS country - and it won't be a moment too soon. It's the Obama country now, and we are simply renting our living quarters from him. If we misbehave, Obama will kick us out - as he should...
The article is quite unremarkable, the author is glad to inform the readers that president Obama is dealing very effectively with the flu epidemic. It says that Obama left little to chance, namely:
1. He created a website with public information;
2. He produced a series of public announcements which as the NYT says "featured fuzzy Sesame Street characters Elmo and Rosita singing in English and Spanish";
3. Obama even "staged role-playing exercises for public health officials". There were uncomfirmed reports that Barack Obama took an active part in the role-playing and came to the exercise dressed as a fireman, while Michele Obama was a Dominatrix;
4. And lets not forget the highly memorable and efficient appeal by Obama to the people of Earth to wash their hands and wipe their asses;
5. Lastly, Obama met with a lot of people and told his team to work hard.
In short, Obama was nothing short of brilliant in his struggle against the swine flu. There was one tiny little problem - maybe the word "problem" is a bit too strong, I guess we should say a "hic-up" - and I am not sure is even worth mentioning. Namely, not enough vaccines were made. Obama's administration promised in July to deliver 120 million doses of vaccine by the end of October. In reality, 23.2 million doses were made available to the masses. That's about 1 vaccine per 15 Americans - and Obama handily beat the record previously held by the Soviet Army, when in autumn of 1941 it was providing about one rifle per four soldiers on the frontlines with the Nazi wermacht.
I don't know about you, but I would say that this situation is typical - Obama wages a brilliant campaign filled with slogans and speeches, nice websites are run by well-trained people, and the president himself makes heart-felt appeals to the masses - but at the end of the day, well, people are left standing in the rain waiting for the actual cure. And some of them blame Obama for this?! The ungrateful bitches!
At some point, Obama will blew the casket at the annoying prols who whine about the so-called issues, and he will most likely sound like John Cleese from Fawlty Towers.
Scroll to the end of the video around 28th minute to see John Cleese, who finally had it and gives all he has to the guests of his hotel.
In fact, I believe John Cleese perfectly encapsulates the reply that Obama administration is already giving to the plebs - from complaint that troublemakers with nothing better to do are sticking noses into his affairs to the conclusion that his critics are nazis. I am really curious at what point he will tell the American people to pack their things and leave HIS country - and it won't be a moment too soon. It's the Obama country now, and we are simply renting our living quarters from him. If we misbehave, Obama will kick us out - as he should...
Friday, October 9, 2009
This is really funny...
Ezra Klein wrote: "Obama also awarded Nobel prize in chemistry. 'He's just got great chemistry,' says Nobel Committee
An excellent smack down...
Debating the Obama's Yasser Arafat Peace prize:
LoafingOaf:
Maybe they wanted to show, say, Iran, that Obama has the backing of the international community, and it will strengthen Obama's hand in diplomacy with Iran.
Pogo:
Yup, because Iran is all about issues that have 'the backing of the international community'. It's like in their DNA.
LoafingOaf:
Maybe they wanted to show, say, Iran, that Obama has the backing of the international community, and it will strengthen Obama's hand in diplomacy with Iran.
Pogo:
Yup, because Iran is all about issues that have 'the backing of the international community'. It's like in their DNA.
Obama's peace prize makes sense....
As we all know, because of Obama's clumsy actions, Israel, the staunchest US ally now solidly believes that the US president hates her and is supporting the anti-american islamo-fascists. I guess this was enough for the Nobel peace committee to celebrate Obama's achievements.
Surely, if Obama nukes Israel, he will get all Nobel prizes in one sitting, and IOC will declare him the winner of all Olympic events now and forever. Of course, Obama is now in competition with Iran and Al Qaeda, so he better act fast.
Surely, if Obama nukes Israel, he will get all Nobel prizes in one sitting, and IOC will declare him the winner of all Olympic events now and forever. Of course, Obama is now in competition with Iran and Al Qaeda, so he better act fast.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
A tale in quotes and comments...
As a classic tragedy, it starts very optimistically, when the main character is happy and naive, and the world looks very promising...
“In 2016, I’ll be wrapping up my second term as president,” Obama told a rally in Chicago in June 2008. “So I can’t think of a better way than to be marching into Washington Park … as president of the United States and announcing to the world: Let the Games begin!”…
Even later, when the destiny was starting to suck the main character into its dark and smelly place, his top advisor and executioner (officially the Chief of Important Stuff and tax-evading Staff) Rahm Emanuel played down the expectations of the public: “They [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] shouldn’t try to make politics of this. I think they [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] should take some pride in the U.S.’s win, and you know, we’ll make sure they [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] get some good seats once Chicago does host the games.” I am not sure about you, but Emma's promise to provide good seats to the right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers does not sound too reassuring. But alas, Emma did not get a chance to fullfil his promise (threat)....
Now, the introduction is over, and the stage is ready for the main character to enter and change the world forever. President Obama makes an eloquent speech to the IOC committee, a humble speech of a humble man - a speech containing sentences with four Is:
“I’ve come here today to urge you to choose Chicago for the same reasons I chose Chicago nearly twenty-five years ago – the reasons I fell in love with the city I still call home.”
Michele Obama, not to be over-shied by her modest husband, had this to say:
"But I never dreamed that the Olympic flame might one day light up lives in my neighborhood. But today, I can dream, and I am dreaming of an Olympic and Paralympic Games in Chicago that will light up lives in neighborhoods all across America and all across the world."
This surely was enough to silence all the nay-sayers in the IOC. After all, can Rio fulfill Michele's dream, let alone Tokyo? No freaking way! Case closed, right?
But the First Lady in Chief did not stop there. She also reminded the world of how much personal sacrifice she had to go through for the Olympic movement: "Some of my ... memories are sitting on my dad's lap, cheering on Olga and Nadia, Carl Lewis and others for their brilliance and perfection." If one remembers that Michele was 20 years old when Carl Lewis participated in the Olympics, it's clear that the First Lady was tearfully reciting the tale of abuse and humiliation by her late father. I presume the IOC could also imagine how many 20 year old girls would be forced to sit on their Daddy's laps through the entire Olympic Games if Chicago wins the bid - and that surely made them think twice about their choice. After all, some of those Chicago Daddie could be quite accomodating and may well share those nice girls, if you know what I mean.
If this heartbreaking testimony were not enough, Michele noted to her supporters: "As much of a sacrifice as people say this is for me or Oprah or the president to come for these few days, so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home."
And indeed, it was a sacrifice. Not only the president, the first lady, and their 100 top advisors had to fly to Copenhagen, a place where all those rednecks clinging to guns and religion live in - a much worse thing happened there - a disgruntled American general leading the US military efforts in Afghanistan was able to sneak through the Obama security service into the Airforce One and bore his Excelency with tales of war and suffering in the far away lands of Afghanistan for a whole of30 25 minutes. As if president Obama does not have any more burning issues than the war in Afghanistan! What a douchebag! Notice though that this failure of security would not have occurred had Mr.President stayed in the White House, and the general would continue to converse with Obama via the pigeon mail and whine about the failure of the Afgan war Overseas Contingency Operation during the talk shows on Oprah.
After all this hard work and unbearable sacrifice - the thunder struck - (think about the steps of the Commodore from the Pushkin's tragedy) - the IOC committee decided that Chicago, a place where Obama grew up from a smallish community organizer to the Top Olympic Games Salesman, and where Michele sat on the lap of her father, was not a suitable avenue for the Olympic games.
When the IOC announced its decision, the NYT was puzzled tothe point it actually wrote something honest: “A sense of stunned bewilderment suffused Air Force One and the White House.”
Senator Burris immediately confirmed what every liberal knew - that Chicago lost the bid “…due to the animosity against the US created by the policies of the last eight years.”
HoosierHawk though is willing to give the president some slack: "I don’t think that you can blame the President for the decision of the Olympic Commitee. My understanding is that the IOC actually visited Chicago. That’s pretty difficult to overcome."
A response from the extreme right was quite predictable - let me quote Hogarth whose response was quite typical for the right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers: "For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of the Olympic Committee." For some reason this sounds like a quote, but my memory is failing me, and I cannot identify who is being mocked by this right-wing mobster and evil-monger... Wait, don't tell me...
Another writer, Mark Buehner dryly observes: "I’m just really glad to see this new era of humility and diplomacy is paying such startling dividends."
I believe Alex Bensky summarizes the views of many with his astute comment: "Personally, I’m at a loss to understand this. The president went there, gave a talk illustrating why it would be a recognition of his charisma and specialness to grant Chicago the games. He even brought his wife who also talked about how special she is and how she would personally find it gratifying if they gave Chicago the games. And yet…the IOC immediately voted otherwise. I can’t figure it out."
Honestly, I am too quite puzzled by this result. Aren't you too?
“In 2016, I’ll be wrapping up my second term as president,” Obama told a rally in Chicago in June 2008. “So I can’t think of a better way than to be marching into Washington Park … as president of the United States and announcing to the world: Let the Games begin!”…
Even later, when the destiny was starting to suck the main character into its dark and smelly place, his top advisor and executioner (officially the Chief of Important Stuff and tax-evading Staff) Rahm Emanuel played down the expectations of the public: “They [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] shouldn’t try to make politics of this. I think they [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] should take some pride in the U.S.’s win, and you know, we’ll make sure they [right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers] get some good seats once Chicago does host the games.” I am not sure about you, but Emma's promise to provide good seats to the right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers does not sound too reassuring. But alas, Emma did not get a chance to fullfil his promise (threat)....
Now, the introduction is over, and the stage is ready for the main character to enter and change the world forever. President Obama makes an eloquent speech to the IOC committee, a humble speech of a humble man - a speech containing sentences with four Is:
“I’ve come here today to urge you to choose Chicago for the same reasons I chose Chicago nearly twenty-five years ago – the reasons I fell in love with the city I still call home.”
Michele Obama, not to be over-shied by her modest husband, had this to say:
"But I never dreamed that the Olympic flame might one day light up lives in my neighborhood. But today, I can dream, and I am dreaming of an Olympic and Paralympic Games in Chicago that will light up lives in neighborhoods all across America and all across the world."
This surely was enough to silence all the nay-sayers in the IOC. After all, can Rio fulfill Michele's dream, let alone Tokyo? No freaking way! Case closed, right?
But the First Lady in Chief did not stop there. She also reminded the world of how much personal sacrifice she had to go through for the Olympic movement: "Some of my ... memories are sitting on my dad's lap, cheering on Olga and Nadia, Carl Lewis and others for their brilliance and perfection." If one remembers that Michele was 20 years old when Carl Lewis participated in the Olympics, it's clear that the First Lady was tearfully reciting the tale of abuse and humiliation by her late father. I presume the IOC could also imagine how many 20 year old girls would be forced to sit on their Daddy's laps through the entire Olympic Games if Chicago wins the bid - and that surely made them think twice about their choice. After all, some of those Chicago Daddie could be quite accomodating and may well share those nice girls, if you know what I mean.
If this heartbreaking testimony were not enough, Michele noted to her supporters: "As much of a sacrifice as people say this is for me or Oprah or the president to come for these few days, so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home."
And indeed, it was a sacrifice. Not only the president, the first lady, and their 100 top advisors had to fly to Copenhagen, a place where all those rednecks clinging to guns and religion live in - a much worse thing happened there - a disgruntled American general leading the US military efforts in Afghanistan was able to sneak through the Obama security service into the Airforce One and bore his Excelency with tales of war and suffering in the far away lands of Afghanistan for a whole of
After all this hard work and unbearable sacrifice - the thunder struck - (think about the steps of the Commodore from the Pushkin's tragedy) - the IOC committee decided that Chicago, a place where Obama grew up from a smallish community organizer to the Top Olympic Games Salesman, and where Michele sat on the lap of her father, was not a suitable avenue for the Olympic games.
When the IOC announced its decision, the NYT was puzzled tothe point it actually wrote something honest: “A sense of stunned bewilderment suffused Air Force One and the White House.”
Senator Burris immediately confirmed what every liberal knew - that Chicago lost the bid “…due to the animosity against the US created by the policies of the last eight years.”
HoosierHawk though is willing to give the president some slack: "I don’t think that you can blame the President for the decision of the Olympic Commitee. My understanding is that the IOC actually visited Chicago. That’s pretty difficult to overcome."
A response from the extreme right was quite predictable - let me quote Hogarth whose response was quite typical for the right-wing mobsters and evil-mongers: "For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of the Olympic Committee." For some reason this sounds like a quote, but my memory is failing me, and I cannot identify who is being mocked by this right-wing mobster and evil-monger... Wait, don't tell me...
Another writer, Mark Buehner dryly observes: "I’m just really glad to see this new era of humility and diplomacy is paying such startling dividends."
I believe Alex Bensky summarizes the views of many with his astute comment: "Personally, I’m at a loss to understand this. The president went there, gave a talk illustrating why it would be a recognition of his charisma and specialness to grant Chicago the games. He even brought his wife who also talked about how special she is and how she would personally find it gratifying if they gave Chicago the games. And yet…the IOC immediately voted otherwise. I can’t figure it out."
Honestly, I am too quite puzzled by this result. Aren't you too?
Friday, October 2, 2009
Is there a resemblance between Obama and Gorbachev?
An interesting article was published about Obama here. The author says that Obama is an American version of Gorbachev. I disagree with this view. Gorbachev took a sclerotic communist system and tried to fine tune its apparatus by giving a little bit of freedom and democracy. As to be expected, communism could not withstand this and the USSR went down in flames.
Obama on the other side took control of a relatively free country, and is trying to drastically decrease its freedom and democracy, while claiming it would make it a better place. In all reality, Obama is a mix of Jimmy Carter, FDR and Peron. Another person to keep in mind is Egypt's dictator Nasser. All in all, Obama intends to make things worse in this country for all freedom loving progressive people, and most surely he will achieve it - and he will hurt whole more folks in the process.
The only positive thing is that he has only 4 years - after that the people will send him a pink slip, and we can start rebuilding America.
Obama on the other side took control of a relatively free country, and is trying to drastically decrease its freedom and democracy, while claiming it would make it a better place. In all reality, Obama is a mix of Jimmy Carter, FDR and Peron. Another person to keep in mind is Egypt's dictator Nasser. All in all, Obama intends to make things worse in this country for all freedom loving progressive people, and most surely he will achieve it - and he will hurt whole more folks in the process.
The only positive thing is that he has only 4 years - after that the people will send him a pink slip, and we can start rebuilding America.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
A challenge to liberals...
Obama's plan requires insurance plans to accept all people with pre-conditions, cover regular check ups (free of charge) and, moreover, they cannot drop anyone from the plan.
Here are a couple of questions for you - what do you surmise this would do to the insurance premiums, will they go up or down? Will the medical insurance be more or less affordable to the people who is now covered?
Here are a couple of questions for you - what do you surmise this would do to the insurance premiums, will they go up or down? Will the medical insurance be more or less affordable to the people who is now covered?
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Obama is becoming an easy target for mockery.
Comrade Obama is getting ready to make a speech to American school children. This is an unprecedented move - the economy is in ruins, his medical care reform is on the ropes, America still fighting two wars (and the war in Afghanistan is getting really hot) - and at that precious time, president Obama decides to make a sweet speech to the kids. Ahm! This is just so similar to what other marxists (think Castro) would do...
Personally, I believe this is perfect. After a while, American people will puke everytime they hear the voice of the annointed one. Another win for critical thinking - moreover Americans could lose some weight too.
Republicans, don't forget to instruct your kids to laugh and boo and make funny faces during the Obama speech. Also, don't forget to buy funny teeshirts that mock Obama. Maybe get the Obama ears to wear.
I've heard on the radio, that one time Alinsky (Obama's left-wing Godfather) organized a protest at the local opera theatre. How did he do it? He got his supporters eat a lot of beans and then they all went to the same opera performance. Alinsky recalls that the effects were hillarious and the "establishment" was very upset.
So, why not learn from the best? Rebellion is fun, really. Lets see how the liberal establishment reacts to mockery. Don't forget to feed your kids a lot of beans before the Obama speech. We cannot let his speech go to waste.
Personally, I believe this is perfect. After a while, American people will puke everytime they hear the voice of the annointed one. Another win for critical thinking - moreover Americans could lose some weight too.
Republicans, don't forget to instruct your kids to laugh and boo and make funny faces during the Obama speech. Also, don't forget to buy funny teeshirts that mock Obama. Maybe get the Obama ears to wear.
I've heard on the radio, that one time Alinsky (Obama's left-wing Godfather) organized a protest at the local opera theatre. How did he do it? He got his supporters eat a lot of beans and then they all went to the same opera performance. Alinsky recalls that the effects were hillarious and the "establishment" was very upset.
So, why not learn from the best? Rebellion is fun, really. Lets see how the liberal establishment reacts to mockery. Don't forget to feed your kids a lot of beans before the Obama speech. We cannot let his speech go to waste.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Obama becomes a religious zelot...
That's pretty funny. In order to promote the government takeover of medical care, Obama is now channelling Jesus and other religious figures. He even claimed he was his brother's keeper.
It's funny though that Obama's own brother lives in utter poverty in a hut in Africa, and the president is unwilling to spend a dime to help him. So, what exactly does Obama mean, when he claims he is his brother's keeper?
It's funny though that Obama's own brother lives in utter poverty in a hut in Africa, and the president is unwilling to spend a dime to help him. So, what exactly does Obama mean, when he claims he is his brother's keeper?
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Nice quote from C.S. Lewis
"It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Obama should provide legal protection for liberal activists
The Obama administration recently announced that it would be collecting information about people’s views on the proposed health care reform. American citizens are asked to report emails, personal conversations and blogs that criticize Obama’s plan to overtake the medical insurance. It’s all good and dandy, and the civil rights groups that went ballistic when president Bush proposed same methods to combat terrorism are quiet now. It also looks unlikely that the media and the courts will attempt to stop Obama from getting American citizens to spy on his opponents. But what is going to happen if a republican wins the 2012 elections, and the new president decides to make the citizens’ reports public? Imagine how would a freedom loving civil activist feel if it is revealed to the nation that he informed the authorities that his neighbor had questioned the Obama care? I mean, we are all progressive people here, but there may be still some reactionaries among us who for some reason hold outmoded and racist prejudices against telling on your friends. I believe Obama must propose a law that would absolutely protect the anonymity of his informants. After all, we know that light is the best disinfectant - so it's only reasonable for the Obama administration to turn off as many lights as possible...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)